Feb 27, 2009

Sci-Fi Experience Wrap-Up

Carl's enthusiasm is contagious. This year, he invited us for the second time to join him in a sci-fi lovefest for the months of January and February. I hate to say this, but I'm not a very big science fiction reader. And I hate it to say it because I worry it'll sound like "Eww, I don't read sci-fi", and that's so not how I mean it. I'm not doubting sci-fi's potential for brilliance - that potential is equal for any genre, I think. It's just that I'm naturally much more drawn to fantasy.

Anyway, all this to say that I joined the Experience again this year in the hopes of beginning to understand sci-fi better, and thus to appreciate it more. And you know what? I think it worked. Here's what I read:
I enjoyed every single one of these books. So much that I can't even pick a favourite. And sure, you could argue that some aren't traditional science fiction. But like Michael Chabon, I'm a firm believer that the only difference between science fiction that calls itself so and science fiction that doesn't is what the cover will look like and where it gets placed at the bookstore.

Memory was saying recently that the reason why she's not big on sci-fi is because it tends to be ideas-oriented, and she's more of a character-oriented reader. I haven't really read enough sci-fi to be able to say if I agree that this is a trend, but I'm also very much a character-oriented reader myself. A lot of these novels had great characters, and that's part of why I loved them. And my favourite sci-fi TV shows, Stargate and Babylon 5, do as well. But for example, Galápagos is very much an ideas sort of novel, and I could hardly have loved it more. It works - the ideas make it work, and Vonnegut's writing makes it work.

If you're wondering where this is going, you're not alone. So am I. Nowhere much, really. I think I'll always prefer fantasy, but I'm glad I pushed myself to go further with sci-fi, and I plan to continue to do so.

Thanks you, Carl. Now bring on the 3 months fantasy lovefest.

Read More......

Feb 26, 2009

Black Hole by Charles Burns

How do I even begin to describe Black Hole? Seattle, 1970s. A sexually transmitted virus has been affecting local teenagers. The virus causes different symptoms in each victim, but basically it causes mutations. Mutations that can go from completely disfiguring to somewhat discreet, like growing a tail or an extra mouth on your lower neck. The story mainly revolves around two protagonists: Chris and Keith, a girl and a guy. Their stories are interconnected, as are the stories of several other teenagers, some suffering from the plague, some untouched by it.

Maybe this initial description reminded you of Peeps aka Parasite Positive, but the two books are really nothing alike. In Black Hole, the virus isn’t really at the centre of the story. This isn’t a plot-oriented story; it’s a story about what these characters are feeling and going through. And the plague is just…there. Part of it, somehow. Not even a catalyst, but more of a physical manifestation of inner turmoil. I read an interview in which Charles Burns said he imagined it as a sort of metaphor for adolescence itself, for growing up, for changing so much so fast you get to a point where you no longer recognize yourself. I think that looking at it in those terms makes a lot of sense.


Black Hole is a strange book. It has a bit of a horror story feel to it, but, even though it can be disturbing at times, I wouldn’t call it horror. It’s really a story about being young and dealing with confusion, alienation, loneliness, identity crises, sexuality, loss. About growing up and changing and growing apart from people you still love but can’t seem to communicate with anymore.

The unique black and white art certainly contributes to the book’s strangeness. I can’t even think of how to describe it, which is why I’m showing you instead. When I finished Black Hole, all I could think about was how strange it was. Not in a bad way, mind you, but it still took me a day or two to realize just how much I’d really enjoyed it. This is a book where mood plays a very big role, and the mood of the story stayed with me. I keep thinking about the last few pages in particular, which I found very touching. Not everyone will enjoy Black Hole, I’m sure. But if you like stories that are dark and meaningful and eerie, and if you're in the mood for something a little different, consider giving it a try.


I first heard of this book when Dewey reviewed it, and at the time she mentioned that Neil Gaiman was working on the script for an upcoming movie. When I finished the book I was more excited about the movie than ever, but sadly it seems that he’s no longer working on the project. Black Hole is one of those stories that definitely have to be changed if they are to work on the big screen, but I was hoping for something that, even if not faithful to the book plot-wise, would be very faithful to it in mood and tone. And I’m sure Neil Gaiman would have done a wonderful job. Ah well. I still hope that the movie will be a good one.





Other Opinions:
The Hidden side of a Leaf
The Written World

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......

Feb 25, 2009

The Love We Share Without Knowing by Christopher Barzak

This is not enough, I had thought.
And Death replied:
“But this is what you have.”


The Love We Share Without Knowing
is a novel in stories centred around a group of people living in contemporary Japan. Elijah Fulton is a teenager whose family moved to Japan because of his father’s job, and who feels isolated and out of place in his new home. The second story, connected to the first through one of the characters, is about four young people who form a suicide club. The third is about Danny, an American teaching English in Japan who falls in love with another man. The fourth story is about a group of expatiates, and the things that bring them together and the things that keep them apart. I could tell you more, but this is probably enough to give you an idea of what to expect. All the stories are connected, both thematically and because the characters inhabit the periphery of one another’s lives.

The Love We Share Without Knowing is a difficult book to classify. It’s undoubtedly a work of speculative fiction. I’ve seen it compared to Murakami, possibly because it does mix fantasy and reality in a way that is somewhat similar to Murakami’s. But Murakami is, of course, not the only author who does this, and I found The Love We Share Without Knowing quite different in mood and tone.

This novel is filled with things like shape-shifting foxes, old Japanese curses, ghosts, and blind men regaining their sight. But above all it’s filled with beautiful, melancholy stories about grief and loss, love, longing and loneliness, intimacy and connections or the lack thereof. About being alive and feeling all the things that it implies, or not feeling them and wanting to feel them so desperately. About trying to find a place, real or imaginary, that feels like home.

I don’t even know if I should be trying to pinpoint what The Love We Share Without Knowing is about. It’s just a really beautiful book. It’s so human, so full of warmth, so quietly perceptive. It broke my heart and it put it back together again. Not many books achieve this, but Christopher Barzak has done it twice now. When I finished this book, I wanted to laugh and cry; I was both immensely sad and very glad to be alive.

I loved the way the book is structured. I loved figuring out the connections between one chapter/story and the next. As I said, there’s more to it than just the fact that these characters known one another (sometimes just barely, sometimes very well). What matters the most is that they are people of different ages and genders and cultures, people in very different circumstances, who are all feeling more or less similar things. Feeling the love and loneliness and longing we all share without knowing.

The Love We Share Without Knowing is a sad book, but I wouldn’t call it bleak. Suicide is a central element in two of the stories, and all these characters feel lost and alone, but really, when I finished the book I was glad to be alive, even if that
sometimes means feeling lost and alone. I loved that the book didn’t try to teach any inspirational lessons, or to propose any miraculous fixes. The point of The Love We Share Without Knowing is not to say, “Look at all these people, quietly going through the same. If only they’d reach out more, everything would be okay”. Maybe it would be, or maybe it wouldn’t. Most likely it would be for some people, but sadly not for others. But whether or not we manage to overcome our silence, or other people’s silence, regardless of how clumsy we are at comforting one another, sometimes just being aware of all the things we share without knowing, of everything that connects us, is a big comfort.

My two favourite chapters were the ones about Danny. The first is about how he meets his lover and how their relationship develops. Then something happens at the end of the story, which I can’t tell you about. But when we meet him next he has been missing for a while, and his mother has come to Japan to take him home. She doesn’t want to talk about what happened because it implies acknowledging that her son was in a relationship with another man. They have a conversation near the end of the story that…wow. It’s just so human, so well-written, so sad. I felt for them. Not just for Danny, but for them both.

The Love We Share Without Knowing joins Paper Towns and Tender Morsels as one of my favourite reads of the year so far. I was looking for other blog reviews of this book, but I couldn’t find any. The fact that there isn’t more blog love for Christopher Barzak makes me sad. I should try to blackmail you all into reading his books. Maybe I could try promising to mail chocolate, bookmarks or puppies to anyone who reads one in the next two months. Okay, sadly I can’t mail you puppies, but the other two…I’d do it.

Anyway, I tried to spread the love last year by giving away a copy of One for Sorrow, and I have the feeling I’ll be doing the same soon with this book. And by “soon” I mean next week, for the Book Giveaway Carnival.

You can read a guest post by Christopher Barzak at John Scalzi’s blog here. (And if being featured in one of John Scalzi's The Big Idea posts is not one of then ten symptoms of awesomeness, then I don't know what is.)

EDIT TO ADD: Another one of the ten symptoms of awesomeness surely has to be offering a copy of The Love We Share Without Knowing to the first ten bloggers who e-mail him. Come on, people! You know you want one.

Other Opinions:
Melissa's Bookshelf

Becky's Book Reviews
My Cozy Book Nook
Medieval Bookworm
The Written World

Read More......

Feb 24, 2009

Tender Morsels by Margo Lanagan

And here she was; back where terrors could immobilize her, and wonders too; where life might become gulps of strong ale rather than sips of bloom-tea.
Liga Longfield, aged fourteen, lives with her father on the outskirts of a village. The story’s setting is never quite identified, but Lanagan said she imagines it to be a fairy tale Eastern Europe. Liga’s mother is dead, and ever since her passing her father has been sexually abusing her. As no means of contraception are used, Liga experiences repeated pregnancies and miscarriages, some induced by the herbs her father gets from Muddy Annie, a local wise woman. Liga is kept so isolated that she doesn’t even realize what’s happening at first. She doesn’t make the connection between her bleeding and suffering and the teas her father gives her to, he claims, “make her bones strong”.

When she does, however, she successfully hides a new pregnancy for six months. Something then happens that takes her father out of the scene, and Liga gives birth to a daughter, Branza. She is later raped again by a group of town boys who hear that she’s living alone, and a second daughter, Urdda, is conceived. Liga almost takes her own life, but instead she finds her way into the land of her Heart’s Desire – a world similar to the real one, but with no place for violence or harshness. A world seemingly ideal to raise two girls in. But the real world, with its charms and intrusions, cannot be kept at bay forever.

Tender Morsels deals with rape, but it’s never actually explicit. What it does is suggest what happens, and your mind does the rest. But nothing is actually masked. Especially not the impact, physical and psychological, that this kind of violence has on Liga. I love that Margo Lanagan doesn't ever make us pity Liga. She makes our heart break for her, yes, and she makes us love her, and respect her, and wish her the very best.

I seriously couldn’t have loved Tender Morsels more. It’s such an intelligent, sensitive book. It’s both brutal and gentle, both subtle and completely naked. It deals with gender, with power, with violence against women, with sexuality in its cruellest as well as its sweetest aspects, with vulnerability and fear, with compassion and motherhood and love.

There are three main moments in the story: the first is when Liga is living in the real world. The second is when her daughters are growing up in the place of her Heart’s Desire. This part borrows some elements from the Snow White and Rose Red fairy tale, with the two sisters befriending enchanted bears. And finally, in the last third or so of the book, Liga, Branza and Urdda are back in the real world (this is not a spoiler, by the way, as it’s clear from the beginning that they will eventually have to return).

This last one was actually my favourite part of the story, when they, as Branza puts it at one point, begin to have to deal with the complications of real people who have wants of their own. I’ve seen a review that compares Tender Morsels to a George Eliot novel, and while I can’t (yet!) speak for myself, this is indeed how I’m always told Eliot is: the subtleties and the complexities of human interactions, the ambiguity, the realness, the lack of easy answers. All the characters and their feelings feel so real. And Margo Lanagan captures things so perceptively, so wisely; she treats them with such care. This novel left me with the same kind of "wow, she knows so much about people" feeling I get when I read Terry Pratchett's best novels.

There is one scene in particular that I loved. It’s honestly one of the best scenes I have ever come across, in books of any kind. It’s when Liga is telling someone for the first time what happened to her, who fathered her daughters. It’s a perfect scene, as much for what is said as for what it isn’t. The gaps, the silences, the little space between these two women: they’re so full of feeling. Full of the brim. It’s a quiet and delicate scene, not particularly dramatic, but wow, the emotions are all there. It made me cry for two reason—first because it’s a very touching moment in the story, and secondly because I was awed that I'd found a piece of fiction this perfect.

There are other moments, other quiet, touching, unforgettable little moments between people. The two town boys who survive the enchantment of the she-bear comforting each other. Davit and his wife Todda talking in the dark. Even if it weren’t for everything else—and everything else is so much—the book would be worth reading for these moments alone.

And I haven’t even begun to tell you about the writing yet. The writing, too, is perfect, and beautiful, and unique. The characters speak in a dialect, and this is an important part of what gives the book its distinctive flavour. I can’t really explain it, so you’ll have to see for yourself. It has a folktale feel to it, but it’s more than that.

Tender Morsels is a serious, strange, heartbreaking and beautiful book. And it’s so sweet. It’s full of horrors, yes, but it’s also truly sweet, sweet in a genuine, not at all sugar-coated sort of way. It’s so full of tenderness. It reminded me of The Graveyard Book, actually. The two books are not really similar, but one reminded me of the other in a very specific way, which has to do with how they deal with the theme of safety versus, well, life. And with parenthood: loving your children but knowning when to let them go.

This is the book I will henceforth shove down the throats of people who dismiss fantasy, who dismiss YA. This book alone is enough to place Margo Lanagan among my favourite authors. I don’t care if I turn out to hate everything else she’s written (which I doubt I will). This is enough. I love it when a book I have high expectations for, like Nation or Paper Towns, actually surpasses them. But I think I love it even more when an author I've never read before knocks me off my feet like this. I’ll tell you something, actually, and if you know me you’ll know how much I mean by this: I’m so glad Tender Morsels won a Printz Honor along with Nation. It deserves to. They deserve to stand side by side.

And now for favourite passages. I tried not to overdo it. Really, I did. These are only a few of the literally dozens of passages I marked. But I have to show you: I have to show you the language, the raw and gut-wrenching power of the writing, so that you understand what her descriptions could do to me, how a single sentence could make me want to cry:
She had been all prepared to love it, but there was not very much to love. She had never seen a baby so thin and wizened. Its face was just creases, thick with down. It had the finest, darkest, sourest lips, disapproving anciently, godlikely, distantly. It had the look of a lamb born badly, of a baby bird fallen from the nest—that doomed look, holy and lifeless, swollen-eyed, retreated too far into itself to be awakened.

The girls were two flames at which she warmed herself to humanness, having long been something else—stone, perhaps; dried-out wood. Their perfect trust that the happy times would continue—she watched it and she sipped it as some small birds sip nectar, and she began, if not to perfectly trust it herself, at least to hope more strongly, at least to look beyond the beauties of the immediate season to the plans and practicalities demanded by the next—or the next several years, maybe? Maybe.

I had never spoke to a woman like this before, who had no apologies for herself yet were not laundress or night-girl nor gypsy. It felt very like talking to a man, except with a man there is always them little jousts going on and those little assessments, yourself against him. There was none of that with this person; now that she had the sense of my predicament, she were bent only on the matter of what I said.

Not one would dare spit upon this woman, or call out at her. She had a different kind of boldness, a strength that did not defy that of men so much as ignore it, or take its place without question beside it—Urdda wanted some of that boldness.

There is something about talking in the night, with the shreds of sleep around your ears, with the silences between one remark and another, the town dark and dreaming beyond your own walls. It draws the truth out of you, straight from its little pool down there, where usually you guard it so careful, and wave your hand over it and hum and haw to protect people’s feelings, to protect your own.

Other Blog Reviews:
Eva’s Book Addiction
Errantry
YAnnabe
Page 247
Six Boxes of Books
Books & Other Thoughts
Bottle of Shine
A Comfy Chair and a Good Book
Neth Space
Reading Rants!
Regular Rumination
A Striped Armchair
The Zen Leaf
books i done read
Fyrefly's Book Blog
My Fluttering Heart
dreaming out loud

(I was sad to only find one…more people should be reading this book. Anyway, let me know if I missed yours.)

And if you find the cover art as amazing as I do, check out the artist’s website. I oohed and aahed for a very long time while going through her gallery.

Read More......

Feb 23, 2009

Old Man's War by John Scalzi

I did two things on my seventy-fifth birthday. I visited my wife’s grave. Then I joined the army.
When John Perry turns seventy-five, he joins the Colonial Defence Forces. Joining the army at his time of life is not as odd as you might be thinking. Seventy-five is, in fact, the minimum enlisting age. Nobody on Earth knows all that much about the CDF, but rumour has it that they have a way of restoring your youth. You're required to serve for at least two years, defending human colonies against alien attacks. Then, if you survive, you’ll be allowed to settle in one of the colonies yourself. The only “but” is that you’re never allowed to return to Earth again. But for someone like John Perry, with not much left to tie him to the world, that's not a bad deal.

John Perry, as well as everyone else who enlists, doesn’t quite know what to expect. But what he and the other “Old Farts” (what he and the group of people he befriends on the space shuttle call themselves) discover is beyond their wildest imaginings.

Old Man’s War is a funny and action-filled military sci-fi story. But it’s really just as funny as it is serious and sad. It's about fighting, yes, but doesn’t glorify war. Nor does it do the opposite, as the horrible fate of one particular pacifist squad member shows us. What it does is show that things have costs. It refuses to approach matters simplistically. It looks under the surface; it asks questions. John Perry doesn’t fight out of a sense of entitlement or moral superiority. He looks at things realistically, and what he sees are several life forms, none inherently more deserving than the others, fighting because they want the same resources. It really comes down to that.

I absolutely loved the human side of the story (which, if you were wondering, is a big part of it). John’s reminiscing about his wife, his connection with his friends, the losses he suffers, the doubts he has. There were one or two scenes that made me teary-eyed, actually. (Alright, make that three or four.) Maybe you wouldn't think so from the plot summary, but the story is full of very touching scenes.

I think I’ve mentioned before that, unlike what happens with fantasy worlds, I can sometimes have a little trouble getting into sci-fi worlds. This doesn't happen with TV series at all, but with books it does for some reason. Well, Old Man’s War was definitely an exception. I was invested in the story from the very start, and I liked John Perry right away. I was sucked in by the humour, the great dialogue, the action, the characters. Everything, really. Sometimes I’m a bit wary of reading books that are part of a series, because the last thing I need is to get hooked on yet another series. This time, though, I’m so glad there are sequels. I want to return to this world. I want to spend more time with these characters. I want to know what happens next.

One very important detail: Scalzi named two minor characters, two members of John Perry’s squad, Gaiman and McKean. How absolutely awesome is that?

Favourite bits:
“There’s no stable ground here,” I said. “There’s nothing out there I feel really safe about. My marriage had its ups and downs like anyone’s, but when it came down to it, I knew it was solid. I miss that sort of security, and that sort of connection with someone. Part of what makes us human is what we mean to other people, and what people mean to us. I miss meaning something to someone, having that part of being human. That’s what I miss about marriage.”

Susan’s death was clarifying to me, a reminder that humans can be as inhuman as any alien species. If I had been on the Tucson, I could see myself feeding one of the bastards who killed Susan to the gapers, and not feeling in the least bad about it. I don’t know if this made me better or worse than what I had feared I was becoming when we battled the Convandu. But I no longer worried about it making me any less human than I was before.

“What is it like when you lose someone you love?” Jane asked.
“You die too,” I said. “And you wait around for your body to catch up.”
“Is that what you’re doing now?” Jane said. “Waiting for your body to catch up, I mean.”
“Not, not anymore,” I said. “You eventually get to live again. You just live a different life, is all.”

Other Opinions:
Bart’s Bookshelf
Stuff as Dreams are Made On
Devourer of Books
Stella Matutina
So Many Books, So Little Time
Bold Blue Adventure
Bottle of Shine
Stainless Steel Droppings
Piling on the Books
Flight Into Fantasy

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......

Feb 22, 2009

The Sunday Salon - A Good Week

The Sunday Salon.comHello everyone. How was your reading week? I'm very, very pleased: I read three five-star novels in a row. Old Man's War by John Scalzi, followed by The Love We Share Without Knowing by Christopher Barzak, followed by Tender Morsels by Margo Lanagan. All were of course great, but I must say that Tender Morsels is the most five-star of them all. In fact, it my view it's a seven stars out of five type a book. Anyway, I'll be posting about these next week, so I guess it'll be Rave Reviews Week.

This week also marked the beginning of my Adventures in the Land of Manga. I posted about the first 3 volumes in the Death Note series here. I have since also read volumes 4 and 5. I don't think I'll post about them, though, because I don't have much to say that I didn't already say about the first three books. Not that the series is repetitive. Far from that. The plot keeps twisting and turning, new characters are introduced, and my interest hasn't waned at all.

I have a question for you: have you ever shied away from a potential new interest because you don't think you can afford the commitment, time-wise? And if so, does it make you as sad as it does me? So much to love, so little time.

Two announcements: First, the 23rd Edition of the Bookworms Carnival is up at The Bluestocking Society. The theme is Literature and Film, and Jessica is asking readers to answer this question: Do you prefer to read the book first or see the movie first?

I'm a book first type of person. I like the slower pace of books. If the story has some kind of twist or surprising revelation, for example, I find it easier to enjoy the foreshadowing and the surprise in a book. For obvious reasons, things happen much faster in movies. Also, if I watch the movie first I tend to get the faces of the actors stuck in my head while reading, and I hate that. The downside is that reading the book first can ruin the movie for me (I know that ideally they should be kept separate, but I have trouble doing that), and I can't remember the opposite ever happening.

Inspired by this edition of the Carnival, I decided to list my top five book-to-movie adaptations:
  • The Virgin Suicides - Hands down my absolute favourite. Everything about it is perfect. Sofia Coppola captured the mood of the book so well. Even the light was just the way I'd imagined it.
  • Big Fish - I love this one for completely different reasons. It's not a faithful adaptation by any means. In fact, a lot was added to the story. But everything that was added feels right, and fits the spirit of the book very well. In this case, I actually watched the movie first, and for a while I liked it better than the book. But on a second read, I grew to love the book just as much.
  • Lord of the Rings - Yes, changes were made. Yes, things were left out. But these movies were made by people who truly love the world Tolkien created, and it shows.
  • Adaptation- Charlie Kaufman is one of my absolute favourite writers. He took Susan Orleans' book The Orchid Thief and turned it into something completely different - into something that is also about the process of adapting a book into a movie in itself, among many other things. And it works.
  • The Company of Wolves - a Neil Jordan movie adapted from a short story by Angela Carter. Angela Carter wrote the script itself, and I guess that's part of the reason why this movie captures the feel of her work so perfectly. The darkness, the sensuality, the fairy tale forest and all the things that it hides, as well as those it reveals. I love it.
What about you? What are your favourite book to movie adaptations?

Second and last announcement: Tracy at Book Room Reviews is hosting a Book Giveaway Carnival on the first week of March. I've been quite lucky with giveaways lately, and I can't tell those bloggers who are kind enough to send me books overseas how grateful I am. I know how costly international shipping can be, and I'm so grateful that they open their giveaways worldwide anyway. Some of those are books I would have trouble getting otherwise, but thanks to their generosity I get to read them. So I want to take this opportunity to give back to the community. I haven't decided which book I'll be given away yet, but I'll let you know soon!

Happy Sunday, everyone.

Read More......

Feb 21, 2009

Try Something New: A Mini-Challenge

As part of the Dewey’s Books Challenge, hosted by Chris and Robin in Dewey’s memory, I bring you the Try Something New Mini-Challenge. Here’s how it works:

During the month of March, you’ll be asked to step out of your comfort zone and try something new. It can be something Dewey-inspired, like a comic aka graphic novel, a YA novel, a book on feminism, etc. But it can be something else too: poetry, a short story collection, manga, non-fiction, a cookbook, a book on knitting or other crafts, a book on social issues, a play, a horror book, fantasy, sci-fi, a collection of fairy tales or a fairy tale retold…you decide. It’s not mandatory that you have never ever read a book of the kind you pick before…all I’m asking is that you pick something that is still mostly new territory for you.

To make things more fun, the Mini-Challenge is going to work in pairs: you sign up using the Mr Linky at the bottom of this post. If you're an even number, you’ll be paired with the person before you; if you're an odd number, with the person after you , like we sometimes did for Weekly Geeks. Then you and your partner will get in touch by e-mail and talk about what type of book you’re thinking of reading. If your partner happens to be an expert in something that is new territory for you, then maybe they could offer some recommendations. If you're both thinking of picking the same type of book, maybe you could read it together.

(If we end up with an odd number of participants, I'll take the last person to sign up as my second partner.)

What you do exactly is up to you and your partner, but there’s a third step necessary for completing the mini-challenge: when you’re done reading your chosen book, you and your partner should collaborate on a wrap-up post. It could be a co-review of the book or books you read. Or it could be interviewing each other about the books you read, about the whole experience, about something else entirely. When you’re done with that, you’ll have completed the mini-challenge.

The Prizes: There will be several giveaways. Some will be open to those who sign up, others only to those who complete the three steps of the mini-challenge. By signing up on the Mr. Linky below, you’ll be entered to win a Calvin & Hobbes collection or a set of two of my homemade boomarks.


Those who complete the mini-challenge will be entered to win a copy of Paper Towns by John Green, a $10 Eco-Libris gift card, and yet more sets of homemade bookmarks.



To recap:
1) Sign up and get in touch with your partner
2) Read one book
3) Collaborate on a post

The mini-challenge will run for the month of March, and it's open to everyone,
so you can participate even if you're not doing the Dewey's Books Challenge. Happy reading!

Edit to add:
Final Mr. Linky up here.



Read More......

Feb 19, 2009

Death Note vols 1-3 by Tsugumi Ohba and Takeshi Obata


Light Yagami is a seemingly ordinary high school student. He's more fortunate than most: he comes from a well-off family, he’s obviously intelligent, and he has outstanding grades. His only problem is that he’s a little bored. One day after school, he comes across a notebook with the words “Death Note” written on it. According to the instructions on the first pages, if he writes a person’s name on the Death Note while keeping their face in mind, that person will die. He can specify the cause of death; if he doesn’t, it’ll be heart attack.

Yagami is sceptical at first, but after a little testing he realizes that the Death Note is indeed real. It was dropped by a shinigami, a god of death, who, like Yagami, was a little bored, and decided to stir things up in the human world for his own amusement. Light Yagami begins to use the Death Note to rid the world of criminals. Despite the natural causes of death, the police quickly realises that there is a pattern to all those criminals dying suddenly. They dub the mass murderer Kira, and call an investigator that goes by the nickname L to help them with the case. Very quickly, things turn into a cat and mouse game between Kira and L.

Death Note is seriously addictive. I read the first three volumes in a single afternoon, and already I want more, more, MORE. What’s interesting is that this series’ protagonist, Light, is not exactly sympathetic. I mean, even if you happen to agree with killing criminals, which I don’t, pretty soon it becomes obvious that he won’t stop at that. He is, in fact, a psychotic killer with a God complex.

And yet. And yet I don’t want him to be caught. Mostly because watching his duel of wits with L is just so interesting. I guess this means that the character I identify the most with is the shinigami, who refuses to take sides and is just watching the whole thing with interest.

I’m not sure if I’d call Death Note a thriller or a mystery, but I suspect it will appeal to fans of those genres, as well as to fans of dark fantasy. Technically speaking, there is no mystery, as the reader always knows what both Kira and L are up to. But the books still manage to be very suspenseful. I was constantly on the edge of my seat, trying to anticipate how they’d each try to outsmart the other next. So far, Kira is winning. But L is clearly a worthy opponent.

My first foray into manga was definitely a successful one. I have a feeling I’ll be reading the rest of this series before long.

Other Opinions:
Rhinoa’s Ramblings vol. 1, 2 and 3.
Books & Other Thoughts vol. 1 and 2
Biblio File vol. 1-6

(Did I miss yours? Let me know.)

Read More......

Peeps aka Parasite Positive by Scott Westerfeld

It's amazing how quickly nature consumes human places after we turn out backs on them. Life is a hungry thing.
Peeps, also known as Parasite Positive, is probably the most original vampire story I’ve ever come across. Cal Thompson, aged nineteen, moves from Texas to New York to major in biology. Shortly after he arrives, he's infected by a sexually transmitted parasite. Fortunately, he discovers that he has natural immunity to this parasite, but it still causes several symptoms: heightened senses, extra strength (not superhuman strength, but as much strength as humans are capable of under extreme stress, all the time), extra speed, an accelerated metabolism, constant hunger and sexual arousal, and sparkling. (Just kidding!)

The parasite, you see, is responsible for the condition we ordinarily think of vampirism. Those who are unfortunate enough to be infected and don’t have Cal’s natural immunity become mindless creatures obsessed with hunting. Cal joins an organization whose mission is to control the infection, and his job is to hunt those infected, the Peeps. Beginning with those he infected himself, like his ex-girlfriends.

What we have in Parasite Positive is an unputdownable sci-fi vampire story. But it’s even more than that. Westerfeld ties in several mythologies, and he does so in a way that is completely consistent, believable and logical. Those infected with the parasite have also been called, throughout human history, werewolves or zombies, just to give you a few examples. And this is explained in a way that makes complete sense.

I won’t tell you everything—it’s more fun to read the book and find out the details—but Westerfeld backs everything up with real science. Cal’s story is alternated with short chapters about real parasites and the fascinating, gruesome, sinister and incredible things they do. I can 't overstate how much I enjoyed these interludes. Not only because they were extremely interesting, which they were, but because they really worked in the book. They were more than knowledge dumpring—they provided a context of sorts for what the parasite does in the story. You can't help but start thinking, "hey, if real parasites do all these freaky things, then this could be real, too." And it really feels like it could.

There were other things I loved about this book: the characters, or most of them. The writing. The great sexual tension between Cal and Morgan. The red-eyed cats. (I'd explain, but it's spoiler-ish. Aren't you curious, though?) The fact that it managed to scare me at times. I'm not at all easy to scare, but some of the underground rat-filled scenes left me very uneasy. The pacing, which was great for most of the story.

Which brings me to my only complaint: the ending felt too rushed, and itwas less than satisfying. When there were 20-30 pages to go, so many things were still unresolved that I started thinking it was going to end with a cliff-hanger, and that I was going to be left shaking until I could get my hands on the sequel. But in those last few chapters everything was resolved a little too fast. And perhaps because of the rush, certain things turned out not to be as mysterious or interesting as I was hoping they'd be. As the rest of the book had made me believe they'd be, really.

But this is an excellent book regardless. It turns out that the sequel, The Last Days, is more of a companion book. It does take place after this one, but it's about different characters. You can bet I'm going to read it anyway, though.

Other Blog Reviews:
YA Fabulous
Guys Lit Wire
Bookshelves of Doom
Mari Reads
Bart's Bookshelf
The Written World
Becky's Book Reviews
5-Squared

And more via Renay

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......

Feb 17, 2009

Ratha's Creature and Clan Ground by Clare Bell


Ratha’s Creature
and Clan Ground are the first two books of The Named, a series of YA fantasy books about a society of sentient felines living in pre-historic times. The protagonist is Ratha, a female cat, who is just a cub when we first meet her at the start of the series. Ratha doesn’t quite fit in with her clan. While she shares most animal’s natural fear of fire, she’s also drawn to it, curious about it. Her taming of what she thinks of as the Fire Creature leads to her banishment, but ultimately it proves essential for the species’ survival. Before that, however, Ratha has to leave everything she's ever known behind and learn to fend for herself. I'll avoid a plot summary of Clan Ground because there’s no wayI can write one without spoilers for the first book. So I’ll just say that in the second book we find an older, wiser Ratha, as well as some of her friends from the first book.

One of the most interesting things about these books was the fact that Clare Bell managed to create characters that feel human, but not too human. I mean, obviously this is a human story, and even if we write about sentient lobsters we’ll inevitable give them human traits. So it feels silly to say they were accurate portraits of wild cats, but they certainly felt like they were. They were sympathetic and easy to relate to, but they also had some mystery, and a certain ruthlessness that would most likely make us flinch in human characters. But not in wild cats.

Or not all the time, anyway. At one point in the first book Ratha did something that temporarily cost her my sympathy. I’ll do my best to avoid spoilers, but it’s hard to talk about this without saying some things about the plot. It has to do with her cubs, and the reason why I was mad at her was because I can’t help but interpret the story in human terms. What she does makes sense if you’re a wild animal, but, as a person, the idea of there being an intrinsic quality whose presence of absence amounts to the difference between being civilized or “barbaric” doesn't make me very happy. I initially thought the series was going in a different direction with this. However, the title of the third book indicates that this issue will be addressed again, and I’m really looking forward to finding out how.

Though both were very enjoyable, I think I preferred Clan’s Ground to Ratha’s Creature. The plot was tighter, the issues the story dealt with interested me more, the characters were even more interesting. I liked the older Ratha better than the young one. And plus part of the story is told from Thakur’s (Ratha’s friend and former teacher) point of view, and I like him a lot. At one point he catches a wounded little monkey, whom he domesticates and names Aree. The idea of wild cats domesticating monkeys might seem silly, but believe me, in the book it really isn’t. And Aree was such a great character.

As in the first book, in Clan Ground I didn't always know to which extent I should make sense of the character’s actions in human terms. There are some things that are very, very human. For example, the events that take place in book one end up bringing improvements to the clan’s life, and this means they’re no longer constantly concerned with safety and food. And so, as people do, they begin to desire something more in their lives, something beyond surirval. As Ratha learns, to acknowledge this desire and to use it positively is essential. There are other moments, however, where I felt the same sort of conflict I feel when watching National Geographic documentaries: one day rooting for the gazelle, the other for the lion. But this is actually part of what makes the series so interesting.

Both Ratha’s Creature and Clan Ground were fun, fast-paced and full of interesting characters. They’re good stories, but they’re also thematically complex enough to have given me quite a few things to think about. I’m really looking forward to reading the remaining three books in this series.

Other Opinions:
Dog Ear Diary (Ratha’s Creature)
Dog Ear Diary (Clan Ground)
Into the Wardrobe (Ratha’s Creature)
Words by Annie (Ratha’s Creature)

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......

Feb 16, 2009

Crow Country by Mark Cocker

At its fullest, studying the life of another living creature is a way of engaging all of your faculties. In short, it’s a way of being intensely alive, and recognising that you are so. At the same time it is a form of valuing life and of appreciating the fundamental tenant of all ecology: that every thing is connected to everything else.
Crow Country is a difficult book to classify. Mark Cocker calls it “a meditation on birds, landscape and nature”. It’s about Corvids, particularly rooks, and it’s part natural history and part memoir. The author writes about the birds that are the object of his fascination, but also about his fascination itself—he questions it, he tries to map its origins, to make sense of it.

So: Corvids. The Corvidae family includes crows, ravens, magpies, jays, jackdaws, rooks, etc. Crow Country taught me a lot about them. They are very smart birds. Rooks in particular are very social animals. And they’re fascinating to read about. Mark Cocker points out that even though they’re birds most people are very familiar with, we don’t actually known all that much about them. They have a bit of an aura of mystery.


A Blue Jay

One of my favourite chapters was the one on crow lore, where Cocker writes about the “inner rook”, the one that populates our imagination. He retells an anecdote he heard when he was a little boy: a friend of his father claimed to have seen a “rook parliament” on the road from Buxton to Manchester. The rooks gathered around one of their own, apparently to decide its fate. When his father’s friend travelled back to Buxton, the rebel rook had been executed. I know I’ve come across this particular bit of lore before, and I’m almost sure it was in a Neil Gaiman book. American Gods? Sandman? Does anyone remember?


A Rook

There was a lot I liked about Crow Country, but unfortunately I didn’t love it quite as much as I was hoping to. There were two reasons why: first, the writing. It’s funny, because one of the reasons why I got this book was because I’d heard a lot about how great Mark Cockner’s writing was. And I can see why people appreciate it, but it doesn’t always work for me. His descriptions of natural landscapes in particular are a bit…hazy? He uses a lot of imagery and metaphor, but I find that he uses them a little too much, and as a result they make the scenery he’s describing more difficult to visualize, rather than easier. But again, this is me. I imagine that not everyone would have this reaction to his use of language.


A Carrion Crow
The second reason was the fact that I was expecting the book to have mostly natural history bits, with a personal musing here and there, but if anything the balance is in the opposite direction. Again, this will not be a problem for everyone. And I was interested in some of his more personal mediations. But not in all of them, I’m afraid. I’ll tell you about one I did love, though. He writes about how some people, some of his friends even, find the fact that he’s so passionate about birds somehow pitiful. He says:
But why is it that people who are absorbed by something are seen as sad? And what licenses that particular remark? What strange presumption fortifies the unengaged and the dispassionate to express this scorn for the enthusiast?
(…)
I can’t explain it, but for me the reverse state of affairs is true. To be engaged is to be a part, to be absorbed and fulfilled. To be cool, to be detached from things and have no passionate feeling is the real sadness. At the heart of depression, that quintessentially modern malaise, is a deep sense of separation from the rest of life.
I don’t really understand this either. Why are passion and enthusiasm considered vaguely embarrassing or sad? Some people act as if loving things is a poor replacement for “real life”. But what are our “real lives” if not the sum of the things we love, whatever those things are? Have you ever felt this yourself? Do you find that people tend to look down on those who show a lot of enthusiasm?


A Jackdaw

But back to the book: although I didn’t love Crow Country, I did enjoy it. I learned a lot of interesting things, and I was left with a desire to read more about birds, any birds. I have a slight case of bird phobia, I confess, but they fascinate me as much as they frighten me. One thing I’d love to read is a good book on general bird lore. I know that knowing the stories that are told about particular birds would make spotting them even more fun. That’s one of the reasons why I love lore, myths and legends. Knowing all those hidden stories makes me see more when I look around. They're not real, but they make the world more interesting. And actually, I want a good science book on birds for the exact same reasons. Knowing real facts makes the world more interesting too.


A Magpie

Two more notable passages:
The naming of the thing gives you the wonderfully reassuring illusion that you know it. You don’t. Sometimes all you have is a single datum. The name. In a bizarre way, the process of recognition can actually be a barrier rather than a doorway to genuine appreciation.

Yet perhaps they [our ancestors] too found the landscape steeped in familial memories, rich in their own ancestors’ oral tales, which were passed down round the camp-fire generation to generation. No matter what the age, we all feel—we relish it, perhaps, like a great enveloping overcoat—the great weight of history in a landscape, and sense ourselves to be at the end of a long process.
I'll leave you with a link to this lovely review by Terri Windling, which was the reason why I got this book.

(Have you also reviewed this book? Leave me your link and I'll add it here.)

Read More......

Feb 15, 2009

East by Edith Pattou

A couple of weeks ago, Kailana and I noticed we were both planning to read East by Edith Pattou, so she suggested we read it at the same time and review it together. We decided that we’d each ask the other five questions about the book, and then we'd post our answers the same day. But before I give you Kailana’s questions and my answers, a short introduction: East is a retelling of the Norwegian fairy tale “East of the Sun, West of the Moon”, an animal bridegroom tale with many similarities to the myth of Cupid and Psyche. In East, the protagonist is Rose, the youngest daughter in a large sixteenth-century Norwegian family. The novel follows the plot of the fairy tale pretty closely, but I was as engrossed as if I’d never heard the story before.

1. Is this the first retelling of "East of the Sun, West of the Moon" that you have read? Did you think she did a good job retelling the tale? Do you recommend any other versions?

Even though “East of the Sun, West of the Moon” is my favourite fairy tale, this is indeed my first retelling. I think Edith Pattou did an excellent job. The novel is close enough to the fairy tale that it feels familiar, but there’s more than enough variation to keep the reader interested. I liked all the details she added: Rose’s family, the Troll’s background, the real world setting, etc. My favourite thing about fairy tale retellings is how they add characters with believable personalities, emotions and motivations to the bare bones of a well-known plot, and I think she really succeeded in this regard.

There’s another retelling of this fairy tale that I’ve heard great things about: Snow and Moon, Ice and Snow by Jessica Day George. I’ll have to pick that one up one of these days.

2. Tell us about a favourite scene or moment in the book. (Going to use this one too)
I absolutely loved Rose and Malmo’s journey through the ice in the Arctic. The descriptions were beautiful without being overdone, and I could perfectly visualize the vast white landscapes. Part of the reason why I loved it is that I’ve always loved stories about Arctic exploration. Another reason is that I loved Malmo herself—she’s an Inuit shaman who helps Rose in her search for the White Bear, and she’s just such an interesting character.

I also loved how Pattou included details about the traditional Inuit way of life (which I hope are well-researched and accurate! I’m a bit traumatized by recent events, but there’s an interview with Pattou at the end of my edition of the book, and she does mention reading several books on the subject.)

3. What did you think about Rose? Was she a likeable character? Did you think that her story and character was told well enough that you could believe in her?
I liked Rose a lot. She was impetuous, but not silly; she was smart and she was determined. I did believe in her. I loved the fact that she grew as a character and learned so much about herself throughout the story.

One of the main reasons why I believed in her was because of her motivation in going after the White Bear. I love fairy tales, but I don’t expect them to have realistic relationships. Fairy tale retellings, however, are a whole other story. In East, Rose and the White Bear developed a pleasant companionship during the year she spends at the enchanted castle, but they don’t get to know each other all that well. So as I read on, part of me began to worry that she would suddenly realize he was the love of her life when she lost him and would go after her because she couldn’t live without him, or something along those lines. To be honest, that would have ruined the book or me. (And this is not as cynical as it sounds. I'm all for romance, but romance in which the protagonists actually know each other.)

Fortunately, that’s not what happens. Rose decides to find the White Bear because she knows that her impulsive act has doomed him to a terrible fate. She acknowledges that she doesn’t know him all that well, and there’s no talk of love until much later in the book. But she feels responsible for this mysterious being who was kind to her and whom she failed to help because of a mistake.

4. What did you think about the real world intertwined with the make believe one? Did the use of real places (with altered names) and history take away or add to the book for you? Why?
For me it definitly added to the book. I’m a big fan of books in which a real historical setting and magical elements are intertwined. I loved all the historical details – the bits about sixteenth-century Norway and France, about navigation, about Norse myth, about mapmaking, etc. But I also loved how, despite the real setting, the story still has that “once upon a time, in a land far far away” feel. It probably helps that Pattou never identifies the time and place directly. I know it’s the sixteenth-century because she says so in the interview, but in the book itself the timing is vague (though the reference to Portuguese caravels did make me suspect it was around then).

5. Now that you have had time to finish the book, what is one thing that sticks in your mind that you will remember anytime that you hear mention of this novel? Is there anything, or do you think you will forget about it as time goes by?
Hmmm…I think I will remember the Trolls, strange though this might sound. I love how Pattou developed them and gave them a background, a language, and way of life of their own. I found them both frightening and fascinating. The Troll Queen was cruel, but she too had believable motivations. And the existence of Tuki (a young Troll Rose befriends) gave them some depth, made them more interesting than they’d be if they were simply portrayed as mindlessly cruel human-enslaving monsters. The story shows us their dark side, of course, but we also get the feeling that there’s more to their society than that. And if you think about it, the cruelty with which they treat humans isn’t too different from the cruelty with which humans sometimes treat what they see as “lesser beasts”.

One thing I’ll probably forget are the secondary characters (other than Malmo, Tuki, Neddy and Rose’s parents). The story uses multiple points of view, including that of Rose’s brother Neddy, so him I'll remember. But she has a large family, and the rest of them I’ll probably forget . Which is only natural, I guess, since they mostly remain in the background.

I’ll leave you with a passage I really liked:
Rubbing linseed oil into my blistered hands, I thought wistfully of how magic lets up skip over the steps of things. This is what makes it so appealing.
But, I thought, the steps of things are where life is truly found, in doing the day-to-day tasks. Caught up in the world of enchantment as I had been at the castle, it had been the routine things I had missed most, which was why I had set up that laundry room and insisted on doing my own washing. But I had missed so much.
You can read Kailana’s post here.

Other Opinions:
Becky’s Book Reviews
A Garden Carried in the Pocket
Framed and Booked
In Search of Giants

Read More......

The Sunday Salon – This and That

The Sunday Salon.comHello Sunday Saloners (and non-Sunday Saloners too, of course). How was your reading week? Mine wasn’t bad, but I was hoping to get more reading done than I actually did. I had this past week off (and the next too), so ideally I’d have spent it reading to my heart’s content. But I’ll be moving house over the next couple of weeks, so part of my time had to be devoted to preparing to move. I’m also mentioning this so you know what’s going on if I disappear for a while in the near future. Hopefully I won’t, but I’m still not sure how long it will take to get the internet up and running at the new place. One thing I’ll be doing for sure is carrying box after box of books up the stairs. Wish me luck! At least the exercise will be good for me.

This week I finished East by Edith Pattou, which I’ll be reviewing along with Kailana later today, and Ratha’s Creature and Clan Ground by Clare Bell, which I’ll post about later in the week. I also started Peeps by Scott Westerfeld, and so far it’s SO good. It’s sci-fi and possibly horror, and it’s full of fascinating real scientific facts. Did you know about tremadota and what it does to snails? Toxoplasma? Dicrocoelium dendriticum and grass-climbing ants? I sure didn’t.

Another book I’ve been reading is The Yellow-Lighted Bookshop by Lewis Buzbee. Susan and I agreed to read it together and comment on the several essays as we go along. The Yellow-Lighted Bookshop is a book about books, but in a different way than most. Buzbee is a bookseller, and judging by the first essay and the book description, he seems to write more about bookshops and books as physical objects, as well as the history of book selling and publishing, than specific titles. Which is fine by me, because I love those things too. I don’t have much to comment on yet. Susan said the first essay brought her great memories of her own years as a bookseller, but sadly my own brief time working at a bookstore was not a very happy one. So I’ll just leave you with three great passages:
When I walk into a bookstore, any bookstore, first thing in the morning, I’m flushed with a sense of hushed excitement.
I know that sense of hushed excitement so well.
This rainy afternoon my wife and daughter are out of the house, and I’ve got a few hours to kill. An odd phrase that, time to kill, when we almost always mean to bring back time, increase time, re-animate time, actually hold it more tightly. What better place to enjoy the stretched hours than a bookstore.
I had to smile when I read this passage...I was telling my friend Debi something along those lines just the other day.
The habit of book-snooping is, I admit, an annoying one, peering over the shoulder of the person on the bus, or at a café trying to decipher the cover of an open book someone’s busy reading. There’s no judgement in the titles I uncover, it’s mere curiosity, for the most part, with a bit of selfishness to it. I might find what I’m looking for in the arms of a passing pedestrian.
Haha, book-snooping. I must confess I have a tendency to do that. But I do it discreetly (I hope).

You can read some of Susan’s comments here.

And now for something completely different: Zacarias update!


He’s growing so fast. Have a great Sunday, everyone.

Read More......

Feb 13, 2009

We Are on Our Own by Miriam Katin

We Are On Our Own is a memoir about how Miriam Katin and her mother survived the Holocaust by faking their own deaths and leaving Budapest disguised as a rural worker and her young child. Her mother, Esther, is forced to leave everything she owns behind and flee to avoid deportation. Together they roam the countryside, finding work, food and shelter wherever they can, always with the German soldiers only a few steps behind.

We Are On Our Own is an amazing book. It’s actually not as difficult to read as most Holocaust stories. And since this probably sounds completely wrong, let me explain better: I don’t mean it at all dismissively, and I don’t mean to equate “difficult” with “worthy”. What I mean is that this is essentially a survival story. Lisa (the book is subtitled “a memoir”, but this is the name of the little girl in the story) and her mother go through a lot, and their story is sad and moving and dark. But because the perspective is that of a very young child, we are spared some of the horrifying details that can often be found in Holocaust stories. Lisa’s understanding of what’s going on is imperfect, which actually makes the story even more moving at times. For example, before they leave Budapest, a new law is passed forbidding Jews from owning pets, and Lisa cannot understand why her dog Rexy is taken away from her.


One of my favourite things about We Are On Our Own was exactly how well it captured a young child’s perspective. I can’t think of all that many books that achieve this. Very often in stories told from a child’s perspective you can feel the perspective of the adult trying to remember lurking behind the pages. Miriam Katin wrote this book as an adult, so obviously we have that here too, but I found that most of the time the adult was invisible, and the way Lisa understood the world as a little girl permeated the book.

The art in We Are On Our Own is just gorgeous. The pencil drawings are black and white for the parts that take place during the war, and colour for the non-war scenes. I think this worked very well.


The book has an afterword where Katin talks a little bit about the inner conflict caused by her having lost her faith but still wanting to bring up her children with a Jewish cultural identity. I was very interested in this—so much that it made me wish the book had explored this question more. I understand why it didn’t, though. This is the story of how she survived as a child, and these are issues she had to deal with as an adult. Still, I’d love to read a book about her life after the war.


Other Opinions:
The Hidden Side of a Leaf
Nothing of Importance
Maw Books
Age 30+: A Lifetime of Books
The Zen Leaf

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......

Feb 12, 2009

Galápagos by Kurt Vonnegut

Before I begin to explain what Galápagos is about, I have to tell you how the story is framed. At first the narrator seems to be third person, but as the story progresses, you realize that’s not the case. I’m not going to tell you who he or she is (it’s not a major spoiler, but it’s more interesting to find out as you read the book), but I will tell you that they are one million years in the future telling a story that mostly takes place in 1986.

The story is about the Bahía de Darwin, a cruise ship that is to depart from Ecuador to the Galápagos Islands for what is being called “the nature cruise of the century”. The cruise is fully booked months in advance, but a financial crisis, followed by world hunger and wars in several countries, leads to mass cancellations. On the day the cruise was to depart, only a handful of passengers remain. Little did they know that the Bahía de Darwin was going to become a sort of Noah’s ark for humankind, and its passengers the ancestors of a new human race: one with flippers instead of hands and much, much smaller brains. (This sounds like a spoiler, but don't worry: it's revealed in the very first chapter.)

This is a messy plot summary, I know. Kurt Vonnegut’s books are difficult to summarize, but that doesn’t mean they’re confusing or hard to follow. His plots can be complex, but it’s not really about the plot anyway. I read him for his ideas, for his writing, for his wonderful and unique mix of humour and tenderness and sadness.

In Galápagos we find this scenario:
This financial crisis, which could never happen today, was simply the latest in a series of murderous twentieth-century catastrophes which had originated entirely in human brains. From the violence people were doing to themselves and each other, and to all other living things, for that matter, a visitor from another planet might have assumed that the environment had gone haywire, and that the people were in such a frenzy because Nature was about to kill them all.
But the planet a million years ago was as moist and nourishing as it is today – and unique, in that respect, in the entire Milky Way. All that had changed was people’s opinion of the place.
Frighteningly familiar, isn’t it? I love the idea of humankind evolving to have smaller brains because our big ones cause more trouble than they’re worth. Or rather, I love the way Vonnegut writes about it, which is with humour and sorrow and hope. Our brains do cause a lot of trouble, and we can trace things like war, violence and a myriad of sophisticated and cruel ways to hurt others to our big-brain ideas. And history is full of situation that make me wish we only had mouths and flippers.
(Now, there is a big-brain idea I haven’t heard much about lately: human slavery. How could you ever hold somebody in bondage with nothing but your flippers and your mouth?)
But. But at the same time, so many things make me glad we don’t. Things like Vonnegut’s books and banjos and even Beethoven's 9th Symphony (this is a sort of joke that only works if you’ve read the book, I’m afraid). Vonnegut manages to subtly highlight both the pros and the cons of Big Brains, and the result is a book with a unique mix of pessimism and optimistm—a mix I often find in his work. Take this passage, for example:
So I have to say that human brains back then had become such copious and irresponsible generators of suggestions as to what might be done with life that they made acting for the benefit of future generations seem one of many arbitrary suggestions which might be played by narrow enthusiasts –like poker or polo or the bond market, or the writing of science-fiction novels.
It made me go Yes! And then no. Because those possibilities, those arbitrary suggestions, include everything that I love. Not just food and babies and survival, but…what makes our lives what they are. Stories, inventions, curiosity. Everything. But of course, they also include all the terrible ideas our species has had, and we don’t even need to be reminded of how terrible some of them have been. This mix of sadness and awe, of hope and disappointment, permeates the whole book. And I love Vonnegut for it.

Galápagos is such a great book. It’s funny and bizarre and not bizarre at all, and really really touching at times. Once again, Kurt Vonnegut did not disappoint me.

More notable passages:
It pains me even now, even a million years later, to write about such human misbehaviour.
A million years later, I feel like apologizing for the human race. That’s all I can say.

In a sense, too, this man had already been hit by a meteorite: by the murder of his mother by his father. And his feeling that life was a meaningless nightmare, with nobody watching or caring what was going on, was actually quite familiar to me.
That was how I felt after I shot a grandmother in Vietnam. She was as toothless and bent over as Mary Hepburn would be at the end of her life. I shot her because she had just killed my best friend and my worst enemy in my platoon with a single hand-grenade.
This episode made me sorry to be alive, made me envy stones. I would rather have been a stone at the service of the Natural Order.

But I have yet to see an octopus, or any sort of animal, for that matter, which wasn’t entirely content to pass its time on earth as a food gathered and to shun the experiments with unlimited greed and ambition performed by humankind.

That, in my opinion, was the most diabolical aspect of those old-time big brains: They would tell their owners, in effect, ‘Here is a crazy thing we could actually do, probably, but we would never do it, of course. It’s just fun to think about.’
And then, as though in trances, the people would really do it – have slaves fight each other to the death in the Coliseum, or burn people alive in the public square for holding opinions which were locally unpopular, or build factories whose only purpose was to kill people in industrial quantities, or to blow up whole cities, or so on.
Other Opinions:
True Science Fiction
The Zen Leaf



I was getting ready to post this when I realized I would be posting a review of Galápagos on Darwin Day. How fitting. Charles Darwin was born two hundred years ago today. Happy Darwin Day, everyone!

Read More......

Feb 11, 2009

N! (And on blog awards)

I'm doing the letters meme that has been going around lately. Kailana gave me the letter "n", so I will now list ten things I love that begin with "n":
  • Nottingham - where I studied abroad last year. I loved it. Those were happy, happy months

  • Neil Gaiman - you saw it coming, didn't you?

  • No More Shall We Part - my favourite Nick Cave album.

  • Nick Cave - because it's just too easy.

  • Neutral Milk Hotel - okay, I could probably fill this with nothing but "n" bands I love, but I won't because that would be cheating, kind of. But them I just have to include. Also! Yesterday John Green said that Neutral Milk Hotel play a huge role in the book he's working on at the moment. They pretty much set the plot on motion. I might have screamed a little. He says he's not sure if this will survive until the last draft, but I so hope it does. I shall read the book using my Neutral Milk Hotel bookmark and be gloriously happy. (Yes, I have one. I also have a Nick Cave bookmark, now that I think of it. Coincidence?! Yes, actually.)

  • Nerdfighters - I never got involved in the community, but they're awesome and I secretly stalk them all. Yes, all 18,269 of them.

  • Norwegian Wood - Indisputable champion of Books That Made Me Cry. My favourite Murakami, and one of my all-time favourite books. (I like the song too.)

  • Nature - It's beautiful and we need it and we are part of it. Despite the unhealthy amounts of time I spend in front of the computer or sitting around reading, I'm actually very much an outdoors person.

  • Nemo - Still my favourite Pixar movie. I also have fond childhood memories of the Captain. I should read Verne again.

  • Noodles - Yummy. It wouldn't feel right not to include a food item, and sadly Nlasagna or Ncheesecake are not words.

Want to play along? Just ask me for a letter in the comments.


Something I've been meaning to bring up: I want to thank everyone who's been nominating me for blog awards over the past few months. I can't tell you how happy you've made me, or how much I really appreciate it. And I want to apologize for not passing them on anymore. I hope you all understand that it doesn't mean I'm not thankful nor that I don't love you. Quite the contrary - I love too many of you! The book blogging community keeps growing, plus I keep discovering exciting and previously unexplored corners of it, and my reader keeps growing dangerously. You probably know how this goes. Anyway, I suspect this sounds awkward, and you might be wondering why I'm bringing it up at all, but I just wanted to make my new I-really-really-appreciate-you-including-me-but-I-can't-bring-myself-to-pass-them-on-anymore policy official. Thanks for understanding!

Read More......

Feb 10, 2009

Breathing Lessons by Anne Tyler

Breathing Lessons begins with Maggie and Ira Moran leaving their home in Baltimore to go to a funeral a few hour’s drive away. Maggie’s childhood friend Serena has lost her husband to cancer. They drive to the funeral, and on their way back they visit their daughter-in-law, Fiona, whose marriage to their son fell apart. The whole story takes place in a day, but there are several flashbacks to the time when they first meet, to the early years of their marriage, and to the time of the dissolution of their son’s marriage.

I’d been meaning to read this book for well over a year, yet I kept putting it off. I wanted to read it because I’m supposed to be doing the Pulitzer Project (which part of me suspects I’ll never actually finish, but hey, it’s all about trying, right? And finding good books along the way), and also because it’s by Anne Tyler, and I’ve heard great things about her –Nick Hornby even said her book Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant was one of the first reasons why he wanted to become a writer, and that’s a pretty strong recommendation in my book.

The main reason why I hesitated, though, was because the plot summary didn’t appeal to me at all. It sounds like nothing much happens, but that wasn’t really the problem—there are many books I love in which nothing much happens. I suppose the problem was that it sounds a bit like one of those strained marriage stories, with a final epiphany and maybe with a mid-life crisis thrown in for good measure. And more often than not, those don't quite work for me. Well, I don’t know if this is one of those books or not, but I do know I’m very, very glad I read it at last.

Breathing Lessons is surprisingly engrossing. I had trouble putting it town. Yes, nothing much happens, but it’s not a dull sort of nothing at all. The story’s full of small events and of memories of not so small ones, of moving bits, of humorous situations. Anne Tyler’s writing is perfect in its simplicity. The characters are completely believable, the dialogue just right. I breezed through this book, and I was sorry to see it end.

I’m not sure if I’d say that Breathing Lessons is really about Maggie and Ira’s marriage. In a way it is, but there’s more to it than that. I guess mostly it’s about Maggie herself, about her idealism and her shortcomings. It’s just a good story, really; a story about people and disappointments and tenderness and little everyday things. A story about having things not turn out as you hoped they would, but carrying on anyway because that’s what we do.

Also, I loved the fact that there was no final epiphany. Maggie and Ira continue much like they’ve always been. Perhaps they’re a little changed, like we sometimes are changed by a day. I liked it because more often than not, that’s how change happens. Not in a sudden epiphany, but one day at a time.

My favourite scene (I know it's long, but it's so good):
Dorrie worshipped Elvis Presley. Ordinarily Ira humoured her, even bought her posters when he came across them, but on that particular morning he was feeling so burdened, he just hadn’t the patience. “Elvis”, Dorrie said happily, and Ira said, “For God’s sake, Dorrie, don’t you know the guy is dead and buried?”
Then she had stopped smiling and her eyes had filled with tears, and Ira had felt pierced. Everything about her all at once saddened him—her skimpy haircut and her chapped lips and her thin face that was so homely and so sweet, if only people would see. Then he put an arm around her. He hugged her bony little body close and gazed over her head at the Constellation floating in the fog. (…) He had known then what the true waste was; Lord yes. It was not his having to support these people but his failure to notice how he loved them. He loved even his worn-down, defeated father, even the memory of his poor mother who had always been so pretty and never realized it because anytime she approached a mirror she had her mouth drawn up lopsided with shyness.
But then the feeling had faded (probably the very next instant, when Junie started begging to leave) and he forgot what he had learned. And no doubt he would forget again, just as Dorrie had forgotten, by the time they reached home, that Elvis Presley was no longer King of Rock
(Have you read this as well? Leave me a link to your post and I'll add it here.)

Read More......

Feb 9, 2009

Life as We Knew It by Susan Beth Pfeffer

Do people ever realize how precious life is? I know I never did before. There was always time. There was always a future.
The narrator of this story is sixteen year-old Miranda. She begins to keep a journal one spring, and at first her life is like the life of many other teenagers. She writes about her family, her friends, school, a boy she has a crush on, etc. She tells us that an asteroid is going to hit the moon on May 18th, but nobody is particularly concerned. The hit is supposed to be visible from Earth, so there’s an expectant, almost celebratory atmosphere in Miranda’s neighbourhood. But something goes wrong: the impact brings the moon closer to the earth, and tsunamis, earthquakes and volcanic activity follow. Life will never be the same again.

Life as We Knew It is a terrifying book. I said last week that after reading a few chapters before bed I couldn’t fall asleep for hours. Well, apparently I don’t learn, because the following day I did it again. And then I had a nightmare. I dreamed I was part of Miranda’s family. It was winter and we were all in the sun room, and then someone started banging on the door, yelling that they knew we had food and they’d come to take it. We were all completely terrified, and I woke up with my heart pounding.

I hope I’m not making the book sound darker than it actually is, though. I mean, it is dark. First of all because a natural disaster of this kind could indeed happen, and for all our technology (or perhaps because of all our technology), we’re as vulnerable to it as ever. Secondly because stories where people go hungry tend to get to me a lot, and there was a lot of that here. But despite all the darkness, there are a lot of lighter, even humorous, moments. And Miranda writes about everyday concerns as well as life-or-death issues. She’s a little like Anne Frank, who was a young girl like so many others despite her extraordinary circumstances.

I was particularly interested in the family dynamics in this book. Miranda’s parents are divorced. She lives with her mother, her older brother Matt and her little brother Jonny. Take Miranda’s mother, for example. It was thanks to her clear-thinking and determination that the family was able to store food while they still could. But as the story advanced, I wondered at some of the decisions she made. But then again, I can’t even begin to imagine what having to make any decisions at all about certain things must be like. Having to ration your children’s food. Having to wonder who is more likely to survive and make calculations based on that.

I did like the relationships between the three siblings. I liked how despite the many causes for conflict, the family remains close. They’re not exactly a picture-perfect family, but you can tell that they care about one another. And most of the time they respect who the others are as individual people.

Above all, though, I liked Miranda herself. I loved her voice, and I loved the fact that she changes and grows and handles extreme circumstances better than many people would (better than I would, I suspect) while still remaining a believable teenager. She doesn’t give herself enough credit sometimes, but even that seems to be changing when the book ends. Also, Mrs Nesbitt. How cool was Mrs Nesbitt? I loved her almost Granny Weatherwax-ish no-nonsense approach to life and death.

I kept wondering how the story would end, and if the ending could possibly be satisfying. Fortunately, it was. It was hopeful, but there were no magical fixes. Some questions remained unanswered, but that felt right. It’s likely that if the situation were real people would never know certain things. If the answers had been given, it would probably have seemed too auspicious.

Life as We Knew It is an excellent book. I want to get my hands on the companion book, The Dead and the Gone, as soon as possible.


Other Blog Reviews:
The Hidden Side of a Leaf
Life and Times of a “New” New Yorker
Nothing of Importance
An Adventure in Reading
Becky’s Book Reviews
Stuff as Dreams are Made On
Bottle of Shine
Books on the Brain
Stephanie’s Confessions of a Book-a-holic
Some Reads
Presenting Lenore
The Sleepy Reader
A High and Hidden Place
Bookshelves of Doom
Bookfoolery and Babble
Reading Derby
It’s All About Books
Cosy Catastrophe
Reading Adventures
Hey Lady! Watcha Reading?
Jenny's Books
Jackets and Covers
Piling on the Books
Regular Ruminations

(Let me know if I missed yours.)

Read More......