The Wind-up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami

Other than the missing cat, the story involves the call of a strange bird, descents into wells, war memories of almost unbearable violence, sexually charged phone calls from a mysterious but intriguingly familiar woman, two strange sisters who call themselves Malta and Creta, dreams that are much more than they seem, a strange mark appearing on Toru Okada's face, and a mother and son that go by the names of Nutmeg and Cinnamon, among other things.
The book chronicles Toku Okada's life for a year and a half, and over the course of that time he meets a myriad of people who all have stories to tell. These stories are quite disturbing, for the most part, and though they are seemingly unrelated, one slowly begins to notice common themes uniting them.
The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is often said to be Murakami’s masterpiece. Personally I liked both Norwegian Wood and Kafka on the Shore better. But of course this isn’t to say that this isn’t also a great book. It has the vaguely dark and surreal mood I’ve come to expect from Murakami. Also, this time, because of my previous experiences with his book, I was expecting most of the mysteries to be left lingering at the end. Perhaps that was the reason why I was surprised when some of the pieces of the story did fit together at the end. Not everything is answered, but the ending was more satisfying than that of some of his other books.
There was a scene in the book that particularly impressed me, and curiously enough I recently came across a very similar (though much less graphically described) scene in Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close. Both books describe war situations in which the soldiers go to the local zoo to shoot the most dangerous animals, so they don’t end up getting loose with the bombings and attacking humans. This is one more unfortunate consequence of war that we don’t always think of. The scene in this novel was particularly gory, so much that I had to take a break at some point and only gathered the courage to keep reading the following day.
Although I wouldn’t necessarily recommend this book as an introduction to Murakami (but I know many would disagree with me about this), I still think this intriguing and unique story is very much worth reading.
Interestingly the first bombing casualty in Berlin during WWII was an elephant which was killed :(
ReplyDeleteI want to read Kafka on the Shore and depending on how I enjoy that I might try some more.
Engaging blog, fascinating views, superior read. If you get a chance check out my Ancient worldz blog:)love any comments feedback.
ReplyDeleteI was doing fine until the whole 'killing the zoo animals' bit. That's just too sad so I am staying away from this one. Thanks for the heads up! For a while there I was thinking about reading it but my mom would have killed me if I did and ended up crying for a week. I don't care when people die in books but animals are a big no-no. :-(
ReplyDeleteI've read Norwegian Wood, and although I liked the story I never got why the author was describing every single little details of what the main character was doing or seeing. I thought they would have a meaning later (I remember a meeting with two girls one night, where he describes everything about them and then he never meets them again) but they didn't. So I'm not sure I want to read another Murakami, though I have a proof copy of Blind Willow, sleeping woman on the TBR pile. You read it?
ReplyDeleteWhat WOULD you recommend as an introduction? I had After Dark from the library, but they needed it back for another patron before I got a chance to read it. And this one sounds really good to me. But what would be best to start with?
ReplyDeletei have yet to read Murakami as well and this one sounds really intriguing. Which should I start with in your opinion.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read Kafka on the Shore yet but will someday. I've got a few of his books here I need to read. What I have read is Norwegian Wood, Sputnik Sweetheart, Wind-up, and Hard-boiled Wonderland. Of those I found 'Hard-boiled Wonderland and the End of the World' the most readable. Have you read that one? But I did enjoy Wind-up too. Like you said, it's intriguing- there's so much there.
ReplyDeleteRhinoa: That kind of stuff probably happens often... poor animals :( I think you would like Kafka on the Shore.
ReplyDeleteOscar: Hi, and thank you :) I will drop by your blog
Mailyn: I understand how you feel, because I'm the same. That kind of thing really gets to me.
Valentina: He does tend to include a lot of detail, yes, but I find that it helps with ambience and characterization. I haven't read Blind Willow yet, no. I loved Norwegian Wood, but it is VERY different from the rest of his books that I've read. So maybe you could give another one a try? They normally have a very specific mood that just wasn't there in Norwegian Wood.
Dewey and Carl: A lot of people would disagree with me and actually recommend this one as a start, but I'd say "Kafka on the Shore". I had a little trouble getting into this one at first, but with "Kafka on the Shore" I was immediately engaged. It definitely has what I came to think as the "typical" Murakami mood, and the characters are very memorable. I think it's an easy book to love. Dewey, I've read very mixed reviews about After Dark - some people went as far as saying it's his worst novel yet - so that one might not be a good choice.
Tanabata: "Hard-boiled Wonderland and the End of the World" is actually the only one I haven't read of the ones you mentioned. I think I will pick it up next.
cool review!
ReplyDeleteits interesting to know that this one is a bit more conclusive - like you i would've read it expecting nothing to be resolved. thanks for the heads up.
and its also good to know you prefered kafka - it saves me from having too high expectations about this. i assume most people probably read this one first - which is why they prefered it or thought it was better.
Jean Pierre: It is still not exactly conclusive, but, considering that it is a Murakami book, I was surprised I could make some sort of sense of what'd happened :P This one is good too, but like you I fell in love with Kafka, so it's hard to surpass it.
ReplyDeleteWind-up Bird was my intro to Murakami. Wouldn't say it was a good start, but it does give a beginner a sense of the wierdness that usually pop up in his books. If you're okay with the wierdness, you can proceed further.
ReplyDeleteI suppose what's "out of place" in Wind Up Bird is that it's a little more "political" - it explores the Japanese WWII experience - something that not many Japanese writers seem to want to engage with.
My original comment appears to have been eaten by the Internets, but I'm tickled that this book also includes cats.
ReplyDeleteI still plan to read Kafka on the Shore first, but this one looks interesting too.
My first introduction to this author will most likely be Kafka on the Shores. The Wind-up Bird Chronicle does sound intriguing. Thanks for the great review!
ReplyDeleteI'll definitely add Kafka on the Shore to my bookmooch wishlist, then! But I think this one is already on there, so I may end up reading whichever I manage to get first. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteInteresting review. I'm not sure this is a book I would like, but I may check out Kafka. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThank you for another great Murakami review, Nymeth! Having enjoyed "After Dark" so much I decided to give another one of his books,"After the Quake", a whirl. I am about halfway through but struggling through it. Nice to know that some of the stories from "Wind-up Bird Chronicle" do fit together in the end. I have to come to realize that my problem with "After the Quake" is that the stories leave me hanging mid-air!
ReplyDeleteOkay, this one has me thoroughly intrigued. But I think I'll follow your advice to Dewey and Carl, and start with Kafka on the Shore.
ReplyDeleteDark Orpheus: Yes, being okay with weirdness is definitely essential for enjoyment of his work. I am not too familiar with Japanese literature, but yes, you don't seem to hear much about their side of the war. I really thought the way he explored it in this book was interesting.
ReplyDeleteKim: That seems to be happening with my blog lately - I wonder if something's wrong. He does seem to have a fondness for cats. Fortunately nothing bad happens to them in this book.
Literary Feline: I can't wait to see your thoughts on "Kafka on the Shore". I think it's the kind of book each reader will experience differently.
Dewey: I hope you enjoy them when you manage to get them.
Framed: "Kafka on the Shore" is, for me, an easy story to get lost in. Do read it if you have the chance.
Lotus: He seems to do that a lot, and it can be quite frustrating. I take comfort in the fact that his stories normally resonate emotionally with me even if I don't grasp their full meaning. Also, I often wonder how many of the nuance of his work are lost in translation.
Debi: I'd love to hear your thoughts on it!
My first introduction to Murakami was Sputnik Sweetheart. I loved that book and have read Norwegian Wood (also another favorite). I don't know why I've shied away from this one but I really enjoyed your review and it's definitely on my list to read.
ReplyDeleteIliana, Sputnik Sweetheart was my first too, followed by Norwegian Wood. Norwegian Wood remains my favourite Murakami, and one of my favourite books ever. If you enjoy the rest of this work then you should definitely give this one a try too.
ReplyDelete